From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:46:15 -0300 From: Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: Question about OOM-Killer Message-ID: <20050725154615.GA29082@dmt.cnet> References: <20050725121130.5fed7286.washer@trlp.com> <73740000.1122331287@flay> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <73740000.1122331287@flay> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: James Washer , linux-mm@kvack.org, ak@muc.de List-ID: On Mon, Jul 25, 2005 at 03:41:27PM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > Jim, does seem bloody silly to be shooting stuff here, and is > probably simple to fix ... however, would be useful to see where > the DMA allocs are coming from as well, any chance you could dump > a stack backtrace in __alloc_pages when we spec a mask for DMA alloc? > > M. The stacktrace should probably be in mainline, along with some sort of printk ratelimiting... v2.4 has if (unlikely(vm_gfp_debug)) dump_stack(); -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: email@kvack.org