From: Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@engr.sgi.com>
Cc: kenneth.w.chen@intel.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [NUMA] Display and modify the memory policy of a process through /proc/<pid>/numa_policy
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2005 23:05:01 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050714230501.4a9df11e.pj@sgi.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0507142152400.2139@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Christoph wrote:
> This is an implementation that deals with monitoring and managing running
> processes.
So is this patch roughly equivalent to adding a pid to the
mbind/set_mempolicy/get_mempolicy system calls?
Not that I am advocating for or against adding doing that. But this
seems like alot of code, with new and exciting API details, just to
add a pid argument, if such it be.
Andi - could you remind us all why you chose not to have a pid argument
in these calls?
--
I won't rest till it's the best ...
Programmer, Linux Scalability
Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.925.600.0401
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-07-15 6:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-07-15 1:39 Christoph Lameter
2005-07-15 3:50 ` Paul Jackson
2005-07-15 4:52 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-07-15 5:07 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-07-15 5:55 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-07-15 6:05 ` Paul Jackson [this message]
2005-07-15 11:46 ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-15 16:06 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-07-15 21:04 ` Paul Jackson
2005-07-15 21:12 ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-15 21:20 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-07-15 21:47 ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-15 21:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-07-15 22:07 ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-15 22:30 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-07-15 22:37 ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-15 22:49 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-07-15 22:56 ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-15 23:11 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-07-15 23:44 ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-15 23:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-07-16 2:01 ` Andi Kleen
2005-07-16 15:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-07-16 22:39 ` Paul Jackson
2005-07-16 23:30 ` Paul Jackson
2005-07-17 1:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-07-17 3:50 ` Paul Jackson
2005-07-17 5:56 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-07-17 7:22 ` Paul Jackson
2005-07-17 3:21 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-07-17 4:51 ` Paul Jackson
2005-07-17 6:00 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-07-17 8:17 ` Paul Jackson
2005-07-16 0:00 ` David Singleton
2005-07-16 0:16 ` Steve Neuner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20050714230501.4a9df11e.pj@sgi.com \
--to=pj@sgi.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=clameter@engr.sgi.com \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox