From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-Id: <200506271942.j5RJgig23410@unix-os.sc.intel.com> From: "Chen, Kenneth W" Subject: RE: [rfc] lockless pagecache Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 12:42:44 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: 'Christoph Lameter' Cc: 'Badari Pulavarty' , 'Nick Piggin' , Lincoln Dale , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Christoph Lameter wrote on Monday, June 27, 2005 12:23 PM > On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Chen, Kenneth W wrote: > > I don't recall seeing tree_lock to be a problem for DSS workload either. > > I have seen the tree_lock being a problem a number of times with large > scale NUMA type workloads. I totally agree! My earlier posts are strictly referring to industry standard db workloads (OLTP, DSS). I'm not saying it's not a problem for everyone :-) Obviously you just outlined a few .... - Ken -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org