linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 2] mm: speculative get_page
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 07:12:20 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20050627141220.GM3334@holomorphy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <42BF9D86.90204@yahoo.com.au>

On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 04:32:38PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> +static inline struct page *page_cache_get_speculative(struct page **pagep)
> +{
> +	struct page *page;
> +
> +	preempt_disable();
> +	page = *pagep;
> +	if (!page)
> +		goto out_failed;
> +
> +	if (unlikely(get_page_testone(page))) {
> +		/* Picked up a freed page */
> +		__put_page(page);
> +		goto out_failed;
> +	}

So you pick up 0->1 refcount transitions.


On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 04:32:38PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> +	/*
> +	 * preempt can really be enabled here (only needs to be disabled
> +	 * because page allocation can spin on the elevated refcount, but
> +	 * we don't want to hold a reference on an unrelated page for too
> +	 * long, so keep preempt off until we know we have the right page
> +	 */
> +
> +	if (unlikely(PageFreeing(page)) ||

SetPageFreeing is only done in shrink_list(), so other pages in the
buddy bitmaps and/or pagecache pages freed by other methods may not
be found by this. There's also likely trouble with higher-order pages.


On Mon, Jun 27, 2005 at 04:32:38PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote:
> +			unlikely(page != *pagep)) {
> +		/* Picked up a page being freed, or one that's been reused */
> +		put_page(page);
> +		goto out_failed;
> +	}
> +	preempt_enable();
> +
> +	return page;
> +
> +out_failed:
> +	preempt_enable();
> +	return NULL;
> +}

page != *pagep won't be reliably tripped unless the pagecache
modification has the appropriate memory barriers.

The lockless radix tree lookups are a harder problem than this, and
the implementation didn't look promising. I have other problems to deal
with so I'm not going to go very far into this.

While I agree that locklessness is the right direction for the
pagecache to go, this RFC seems to have too far to go to use it to
conclude anything about the subject.


-- wli
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-06-27 14:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-06-27  6:29 [rfc] lockless pagecache Nick Piggin
2005-06-27  6:32 ` [patch 1] mm: PG_free flag Nick Piggin
2005-06-27  6:32   ` [patch 2] mm: speculative get_page Nick Piggin
2005-06-27  6:33     ` [patch 3] radix tree: lookup_slot Nick Piggin
2005-06-27  6:34       ` [patch 4] radix tree: lockless readside Nick Piggin
2005-06-27  6:34         ` [patch 5] mm: lockless pagecache lookups Nick Piggin
2005-06-27  6:35           ` [patch 6] mm: spinlock tree_lock Nick Piggin
2005-06-27 14:12     ` William Lee Irwin III [this message]
2005-06-28  0:03       ` [patch 2] mm: speculative get_page Nick Piggin
2005-06-28  0:56         ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-28  1:22         ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-06-28  1:42           ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-28  4:06             ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-06-28  4:50               ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-28  5:08                 ` [patch 2] mm: speculative get_page, " David S. Miller, Nick Piggin
2005-06-28  5:34                   ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-28 14:19                   ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-06-28 15:43                     ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-28 17:01                       ` Christoph Lameter
2005-06-28 23:10                         ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-28 21:32                   ` Jesse Barnes
2005-06-28 22:17                     ` Christoph Lameter
2005-06-28 12:45     ` Andy Whitcroft
2005-06-28 13:16       ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-28 16:02         ` Dave Hansen
2005-06-29 16:31           ` Pavel Machek
2005-06-29 18:43             ` Dave Hansen
2005-06-29 21:22               ` Pavel Machek
2005-06-29 16:31         ` Pavel Machek
2005-06-27  6:43 ` VFS scalability (was: [rfc] lockless pagecache) Nick Piggin
2005-06-27  7:13   ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-27  7:33     ` VFS scalability Nick Piggin
2005-06-27  7:44       ` Andi Kleen
2005-06-27  8:03         ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-27  7:46 ` [rfc] lockless pagecache Andrew Morton
2005-06-27  8:02   ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-27  8:15     ` Andrew Morton
2005-06-27  8:28       ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-27  8:56     ` Lincoln Dale
2005-06-27  9:04       ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-27 18:14         ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-06-27 18:50           ` Badari Pulavarty
2005-06-27 19:05             ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-06-27 19:22               ` Christoph Lameter
2005-06-27 19:42                 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-07-05 15:11                   ` Sonny Rao
2005-07-05 15:31                     ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-07-05 15:37                       ` Sonny Rao
2005-06-27 13:17     ` Benjamin LaHaise
2005-06-28  0:32       ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-28  1:26         ` William Lee Irwin III
2005-06-27 14:08   ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-06-27 17:49   ` Christoph Lameter
2005-06-29 10:49 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2005-06-29 11:38   ` Nick Piggin
2005-06-30  3:32     ` Hirokazu Takahashi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20050627141220.GM3334@holomorphy.com \
    --to=wli@holomorphy.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox