From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 17:53:27 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [patch] scm: fix scm_fp_list allocation problem Message-Id: <20050602175327.6e257d94.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <429FA5D4.87FD9B6C@akamai.com> References: <200506012227.PAA05624@allur.sanmateo.akamai.com> <20050602161341.3d94f17b.akpm@osdl.org> <429FA5D4.87FD9B6C@akamai.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Prasanna Meda Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Prasanna Meda wrote: > > > > > Given that you need to patch the kernel to support larger SCM_MAX_FD, why > > not add this patch at the same time, keep it out of the main tree? > > Can do. > Ideally every fd openable should be passed over. I work towards that goal > and submit again. No. I meant that given that you are already patching your personal kernel to make SCM_MAX_FD larger, why don't you simultaneously apply this patch? In other words: why does the kernel.org kernel need this patch? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org