From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 21:54:11 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20050523.215411.124651572.taka@valinux.co.jp> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] CKRM: Memory controller for CKRM From: Hirokazu Takahashi In-Reply-To: <20050521000700.GA30327@chandralinux.beaverton.ibm.com> References: <20050519163338.GC27270@chandralinux.beaverton.ibm.com> <20050520.142927.108372625.taka@valinux.co.jp> <20050521000700.GA30327@chandralinux.beaverton.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: sekharan@us.ibm.com Cc: ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Hi Chandra, > > > > > > > > > > I am looking for improvement suggestions > > > > > - to not have a field in the page data structure for the mem > > > > > controller > > > > > > > > What do you think if you make each class owns inodes instead of pages > > > > in the page-cache? > > I think i missed to answer this question in the earlier reply. > > do you mean a controller for managing inodes ? Yes, I think it might be another solution though I haven't examined about it yet. Thanks, Hirokazu Takahashi. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org