From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.106]) by e33.co.us.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id j4JGe1mD606164 for ; Thu, 19 May 2005 12:40:02 -0400 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (d03av02.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.168]) by d03relay04.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id j4JGe1cs219776 for ; Thu, 19 May 2005 10:40:01 -0600 Received: from d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av02.boulder.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4JGe1ea001337 for ; Thu, 19 May 2005 10:40:01 -0600 Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 09:33:38 -0700 From: Chandra Seetharaman Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] CKRM: Memory controller for CKRM Message-ID: <20050519163338.GC27270@chandralinux.beaverton.ibm.com> References: <20050519003008.GC25076@chandralinux.beaverton.ibm.com> <20050519.104325.13596447.taka@valinux.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20050519.104325.13596447.taka@valinux.co.jp> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Hirokazu Takahashi Cc: ckrm-tech@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 10:43:25AM +0900, Hirokazu Takahashi wrote: > Hello, > > It just looks like that once kswapd moves pages between the active lists > and the inactive lists, the pages happen to belong to the class > to which kswapd belong. In refill_inactive_zone()(where pages are moved from active to inactive list), ckrm_zone(where the page came from) is where the inactive pages are moved to. I don't see how you concluded this. Can you point to the code. > > Is this right behavior that you intend? certainly not :) > > > Hello ckrm-tech members, > > > > Here is the latest CKRM Memory controller patch against the patchset Gerrit > > released on 05/05/05. > > > > I applied the feedback I got on/off the list. Made few fixes and some > > cleanups. Details about the changes are in the appripriate patches. > > > > It is tested on i386. > > > > Currently disabled on NUMA. > > > > Hello linux-mm members, > > > > These are set of patches that provides the control of memory under the CKRM > > framework(Details at http://ckrm.sf.net). I eagerly wait for your > > feedback/comments/suggestions/concerns etc., > > > > To All, > > > > I am looking for improvement suggestions > > - to not have a field in the page data structure for the mem > > controller > > What do you think if you make each class owns inodes instead of pages > in the page-cache? > > > - to make vmscan.c cleaner. > > > Thanks, > Hirokazu Takahashi. > > > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Chandra Seetharaman | Be careful what you choose.... - sekharan@us.ibm.com | .......you may get it. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org