linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>
To: 'Wolfgang Wander' <wwc@rentec.com>
Cc: "Hervé Piedvache" <herve@elma.fr>,
	"'Andrew Morton'" <akpm@osdl.org>,
	mingo@elte.hu, arjanv@redhat.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Avoiding mmap fragmentation - clean rev
Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 10:57:00 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200505181757.j4IHv0g14491@unix-os.sc.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17035.30820.347382.9137@gargle.gargle.HOWL>

Wolfgang Wander wrote on Wednesday, May 18, 2005 10:16 AM
> My goal was to place small requests close to the base while leaving
> larger holes open as long as possible and far from the base. 2.4
> kernels did this inadvertently by always starting to search from the
> base, my patch starts searching from the base (upward or downward)
> if the new request is known to fit between base and current cache
> pointer, thus it maintains the 2.4 quality of mixing small and large
> requests and maintains the huge speedups Ingo introduced with the
> cache pointer.

This algorithm tends to penalize small size request and it would do a
linear search from the beginning. It would also penalize large size
request since cache pointer will be reset to a lower address and making
a subsequent large request to search forward.  In your case, since all
mappings are anonymous mmap with same page protection, you won't notice
performance problem because of coalescing in the mapped area.  But other
app like apache web server, which mmap thousands of different files will
degrade. The probability of linear search is lot higher with this proposal.
The nice thing about the current *broken* cache pointer is that it is
almost an O(1) order to fulfill a request since it moves in one direction.
The new proposal would reduce that O(1) probability.

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-18 17:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <E4BA51C8E4E9634993418831223F0A49291F06E1@scsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com>
2005-05-17 22:28 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-05-18  7:28   ` Arjan van de Ven
2005-05-18  7:43     ` Ingo Molnar
2005-05-18  7:37   ` Ingo Molnar
2005-05-18 13:05   ` Wolfgang Wander
2005-05-18 15:47   ` Wolfgang Wander
2005-05-18 16:18     ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-05-18 17:16       ` Wolfgang Wander
2005-05-18 17:57         ` Chen, Kenneth W [this message]
2005-05-19 18:38           ` Wolfgang Wander
2005-05-19 22:54             ` Andrew Morton
2005-05-20  2:02               ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-05-20 23:51               ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-05-23 18:25                 ` Wolfgang Wander
2005-05-26 17:32                 ` Wolfgang Wander
2005-05-26 17:44                   ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-05-20  3:10             ` Chen, Kenneth W
2005-05-20 12:39               ` Wolfgang Wander
2005-05-20  2:14 Chen, Kenneth W
2005-05-20 12:47 ` Wolfgang Wander
2005-05-25  7:30 linux
2005-05-27 16:37 Chen, Kenneth W

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200505181757.j4IHv0g14491@unix-os.sc.intel.com \
    --to=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
    --cc=herve@elma.fr \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=wwc@rentec.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox