From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:08:26 -0800 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 5/6] sparsemem: more separation between NUMA and DISCONTIG Message-Id: <20050318150826.4ca3ad14.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Dave Hansen Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, apw@shadowen.org List-ID: Dave Hansen wrote: > > There is some confusion with the SPARSEMEM patch between what > is needed for DISCONTIG vs. NUMA. For instance, the NODE_DATA() > macro needs to be switched on NUMA, but not on FLATMEM. > > This patch is required if the previous patch is applied. This patch breaks !CONFIG_NUMA ppc64: include/linux/mmzone.h:387:1: warning: "NODE_DATA" redefined include/asm/mmzone.h:55:1: warning: this is the location of the previous definition I'll hack around it for now. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org