From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2005 12:17:07 -0800 From: William Lee Irwin III Subject: Re: page migration Message-ID: <20050103201707.GQ29332@holomorphy.com> References: <41D98556.8050605@sgi.com> <1104776733.25994.11.camel@localhost> <41D99743.5000601@sgi.com> <1104781061.25994.19.camel@localhost> <41D9A7DB.2020306@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41D9A7DB.2020306@sgi.com> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Ray Bryant Cc: Hirokazu Takahashi , Marcelo Tosatti , linux-mm List-ID: On Mon, Jan 03, 2005 at 02:15:23PM -0600, Ray Bryant wrote: > If the consensus is that the correct way to go is to propose the > memory migration patches as they are, then that is fine by me. I will > get my "NUMA process and memory migration" patch working on top of that > (so that we have a user) and then work with Andrew to get them into -mm > and then see what happens from there. Please don't limit the scope of page migration to that; cross-zone page migration is needed to resolve pathologies arising in swapless systems. -- wli -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org