From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 17:20:27 -0700 From: "Martin J. Bligh" Reply-To: "Martin J. Bligh" Subject: Re: [rfc][patch] Memory Binding API v0.3 2.5.41 Message-ID: <2004595005.1034616026@[10.10.2.3]> In-Reply-To: <3DAB5DF2.5000002@us.ibm.com> References: <3DAB5DF2.5000002@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: colpatch@us.ibm.com, "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: linux-kernel , linux-mm@kvack.org, LSE , Andrew Morton , Michael Hohnbaum List-ID: >> 4) An ordered zone list is probably the more natural mapping. > See my comments above about per zone/memblk. And you reemphasize my point, how do we order the zone lists in such a way that a user of the API can easily know/find out what zone #5 is? Could you explain how that problem is different from finding out what memblk #5 is ... I don't see the difference? M. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/