From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 11:18:52 +0100 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/11] alternate 4-level page tables patches (take 2) Message-ID: <20041222101852.GA15894@wotan.suse.de> References: <41C94361.6070909@yahoo.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <41C94361.6070909@yahoo.com.au> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nick Piggin Cc: Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Andi Kleen , Hugh Dickins , Linux Memory Management List-ID: > Comments? Any consensus as to which way we want to go? I don't want to > inflame tempers by continuing this line of work, just provoke discussion. Personally I think it's still better to just convert the architectures over like I did. It has to be done anyways, since you can't leave the warnings in. When that is done it doesn't matter much which level you hcange. I offer my tested patchkit for that :) Main advantage is that since it's already been tested for quite some time it would be possible to merge it much faster. And Nick would save some work someone else already did ;-) If it helps I can do a global s/pml4_t/p_t/ too. -Andi -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org