From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2004 16:13:23 +1100 From: Anton Blanchard Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] NUMA boot hash allocation interleaving Message-ID: <20041216051323.GI24000@krispykreme.ozlabs.ibm.com> References: <50260000.1103061628@flay> <20041215045855.GH27225@wotan.suse.de> <20041215144730.GC24000@krispykreme.ozlabs.ibm.com> <20041216050248.GG32718@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041216050248.GG32718@wotan.suse.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andi Kleen Cc: "Martin J. Bligh" , Brent Casavant , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, jrsantos@austin.ibm.com List-ID: > I asked Brent to run some benchmarks originally and I believe he has > already run all that he could easily set up. If you want more testing > you'll need to test yourself I think. We will be testing it. > At least I don't think this patch should be further stalled unless > someone actually comes up with a proof that it actually affects > performance. I was more concerned about the idea of removing the opt-in part of the patch. If it ends up being a negative for ppc64 it would be nice to have a way to turn it off. Anton -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org