Re: [PATCH 0/3] NUMA boot hash allocation interleaving

[Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>]

On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 11:14:46PM -0800, Martin J. Bligh wrote:
> Well hold on a sec. We don't need to use the hugepages pool for this,
> do we? This is the same as using huge page mappings for the whole of
> kernel space on ia32. As long as it's a kernel mapping, and 16MB aligned
> and contig, we get it for free, surely?

The whole point of the patch is to not use the direct mapping, but
use a different interleaved mapping on NUMA machines to spread
the memory out over multiple nodes.

> > Using other page sizes would be probably tricky because the 
> > linux VM can currently barely deal with two page sizes.
> > I suspect handling more would need some VM infrastructure effort
> > at least in the changed port. 
> 
> For the general case I'd agree. But this is a setup-time only tweak
> of the static kernel mapping, isn't it?

It's probably not impossible, just lots of ugly special cases.
e.g. how about supporting it for /proc/kcore etc? 

-Andi

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>