From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-Id: <200412012004.iB1K49n23315@mail.osdl.org> Subject: Re: Automated performance testing system was Re: Text form for STP tests In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 01 Dec 2004 11:16:07 -0200." <20041201131607.GH2250@dmt.cyclades> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 12:04:09 -0800 From: Cliff White Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Marcelo Tosatti Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: > On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 10:28:24AM -0800, Cliff White wrote: > > > Linux-MM fellows, > > > > > > I've been talking to Cliff about the need for a set of benchmarks, > > > covering as many different workloads as possible, for developers to have a > > > better notion of impact on performance changes. > > > [snip] > > robots are running this test series against linux-2.6.7 ( for history data ) > > There will need to be some adjustments - some of these tests will no doubt > > fail for reasons of script error or configuration ( i see already kernbench will > > have to be redunced for 1-cpu systems, as it runs > 13.5 hours :( ) > > > > And, the second part of the automation is already done, but needs input. > > I can aim this test battery at any kernel patch, where 'any kernel patch' > > is identified by a regexp. What kernels do you want this against? > > The most recent 2.6.10-rc2 and 2.6.10-rc2-mm in STP. > > Will this be available through the web interface? Yes, the results should be visible. If something looks wrongs, email. the 'advanced search' bit needs some test-specific fixes, and may not work for all tests - some of the kits still needs some patching.. cliffw > > Thanks again Cliff > > > I've heard mention of 'baseline' - we call this baseline: > > > > /^(patch|linux)-\d+\.\d+\.\d+$/ > > > > ( starts with 'patch' or 'linux', then '-' followed by three decimals ) > > > > cliffw > -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org