From: Cliff White <cliffw@osdl.org>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: Automated performance testing system was Re: Text form for STP tests
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 10:28:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200412011828.iB1ISOr04501@mail.osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 29 Nov 2004 22:42:12 -0200." <20041130004212.GB2310@dmt.cyclades>
> Linux-MM fellows,
>
> I've been talking to Cliff about the need for a set of benchmarks,
> covering as many different workloads as possible, for developers to have a
> better notion of impact on performance changes.
>
> Usually when one does a change which affects performance, he/she runs one
> or two benchmarks with a limited amount of hardware configurations.
> This is a very painful, boring and time consuming process, which can
> result in misinterpretation and/or limited understading of the results
> of such changes.
>
> It is important to automate such process, with a set of benchmarks
> covering as wide as possible range of workloads, running on common
> and most used hardware variations.
>
> OSDL's STP provides the base framework for this.
>
[ snip ]
> bonnie++
> reaim (default, new_fserver, shared)
> dbench_long
> kernbench
> tiobench
>
> Each of these running one the following combinations:
>
> 1CPU, 2CPU, 4CPU, 8CPU (4 variants).
>
> total memory, half memory, a quarter of total memory (3 variants).
>
> Thats 12 results for each benchmark."
>
The configuration files to do these tests are now written, and the humble
robots are running this test series against linux-2.6.7 ( for history data )
There will need to be some adjustments - some of these tests will no doubt
fail for reasons of script error or configuration ( i see already kernbench will
have to be redunced for 1-cpu systems, as it runs > 13.5 hours :( )
And, the second part of the automation is already done, but needs input.
I can aim this test battery at any kernel patch, where 'any kernel patch'
is identified by a regexp. What kernels do you want this against?
I've heard mention of 'baseline' - we call this baseline:
/^(patch|linux)-\d+\.\d+\.\d+$/
( starts with 'patch' or 'linux', then '-' followed by three decimals )
cliffw
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-01 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20041125093135.GA15650@logos.cnet>
[not found] ` <200411282017.iASKH2F05015@mail.osdl.org>
2004-11-30 0:42 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-11-30 17:00 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-11-30 17:11 ` cliff white
2004-12-01 18:28 ` Cliff White [this message]
2004-12-01 13:16 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-12-01 20:04 ` Cliff White
2004-12-13 11:42 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-12-13 16:22 ` cliff white
2004-12-13 21:02 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-12-14 18:11 ` Cliff White
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200412011828.iB1ISOr04501@mail.osdl.org \
--to=cliffw@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox