linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Buesch <mbuesch@freenet.de>
To: Linux-MM@kvack.org
Subject: find_vma() cachehit rate
Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 10:54:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200411211054.53560.mbuesch@freenet.de> (raw)


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 905 bytes --]

Hi,

I just saw this comment in find_vma():
  /* Check the cache first. */
  /* (Cache hit rate is typically around 35%.) */

I just wanted to play around a bit. Just for fun.
So I wrote the attached patch to collect find_vma()
statistics. I was wondering why my cache hit rate is around
60%. It's always between 55 and 65 percent. Depending on
the workload.
Is this on obsolete comment from the 2.4 days, maybe?

mb@lfs:~$ cat /proc/findvma_stat 
findvma_stat_cachehit  == 356524
findvma_stat_cachemiss == 248728
findvma_stat_fail      == 0
cachehit percentage    == 58%
cachemiss percentage   == 41%
fail percentage        == 0%

My kernel is:
mb@lfs:~$ uname -r
2.6.10-rc2-ck2-nozeroram-findvmastat

If you are interrested to comment on this, please CC: me,
as I'm not subscribed to this mailing list. Thanks.

-- 
Regards Michael Buesch  [ http://www.tuxsoft.de.vu ]



[-- Attachment #1.2: find_vma_stat.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 4760 bytes --]

Index: mm/mmap.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/mb/develop/linux/rsync/linux-2.5/mm/mmap.c,v
retrieving revision 1.149
diff -u -p -r1.149 mmap.c
--- mm/mmap.c	28 Oct 2004 15:17:10 -0000	1.149
+++ mm/mmap.c	20 Nov 2004 22:14:27 -0000
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 #include <linux/mount.h>
 #include <linux/mempolicy.h>
 #include <linux/rmap.h>
+#include <linux/proc_fs.h>
 
 #include <asm/uaccess.h>
 #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
@@ -34,6 +35,12 @@
  */
 #undef DEBUG_MM_RB
 
+/* enable/disable find_vma() statistics.
+ * 1 => enabled
+ * 0 => disabled
+ */
+#define MMAP_FINDVMA_STATS	1
+
 /* description of effects of mapping type and prot in current implementation.
  * this is due to the limited x86 page protection hardware.  The expected
  * behavior is in parens:
@@ -1246,6 +1253,123 @@ get_unmapped_area(struct file *file, uns
 
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_unmapped_area);
 
+#if MMAP_FINDVMA_STATS != 0
+static spinlock_t findvma_stat_lock = SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED;
+static unsigned long findvma_stat_cachehit;
+static unsigned long findvma_stat_cachemiss;
+static unsigned long findvma_stat_fail;
+static struct proc_dir_entry *findvma_stat_proc;
+
+static int findvma_stat_read(char *buf, char **start, off_t offset, int size, int *eof, void *data)
+{
+	int written;
+	unsigned long total = findvma_stat_cachehit + findvma_stat_cachemiss + findvma_stat_fail;
+	unsigned long hit_percent = findvma_stat_cachehit * 100 / total;
+	unsigned long miss_percent = findvma_stat_cachemiss * 100 / total;
+	unsigned long fail_percent = findvma_stat_fail * 100 / total;
+
+	spin_lock(&findvma_stat_lock);
+	written = snprintf(buf, size, "findvma_stat_cachehit  == %lu\n"
+				      "findvma_stat_cachemiss == %lu\n"
+				      "findvma_stat_fail      == %lu\n"
+				      "cachehit percentage    == %lu%%\n"
+				      "cachemiss percentage   == %lu%%\n"
+				      "fail percentage        == %lu%%\n",
+			   findvma_stat_cachehit,
+			   findvma_stat_cachemiss,
+			   findvma_stat_fail,
+			   hit_percent,
+			   miss_percent,
+			   fail_percent);
+	spin_unlock(&findvma_stat_lock);
+	*eof = 1;
+	return written;
+}
+
+static int findvma_stat_write(struct file *f, const char __user *buf, unsigned long cnt, void *data)
+{
+	int ret = -EINVAL;
+	char *kbuf;
+
+	if (cnt < 1)
+		goto out;
+
+	kbuf = kmalloc(cnt, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!kbuf) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		goto out;
+	}
+	if (copy_from_user(kbuf, buf, cnt)) {
+		ret = -EFAULT;
+		goto out_free;
+	}
+	if (*kbuf == 'c') {
+		/* clear find_vma() statistics. */
+		spin_lock(&findvma_stat_lock);
+		findvma_stat_cachehit = 0;
+		findvma_stat_cachemiss = 0;
+		findvma_stat_fail = 0;
+		spin_unlock(&findvma_stat_lock);
+		ret = cnt;
+	}
+out_free:
+	kfree(kbuf);
+out:
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static void findvma_stat_init(void)
+{
+	static int already_tried = 0;
+	if (already_tried)
+		return;
+	printk("initializing find_vma() statistics... ");
+	findvma_stat_proc = create_proc_entry("findvma_stat", S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR, 0);
+	if (!findvma_stat_proc) {
+		printk("FAILED.\n");
+		already_tried = 1;
+		return;
+	}
+	findvma_stat_proc->read_proc = findvma_stat_read;
+	findvma_stat_proc->write_proc = findvma_stat_write;
+	findvma_stat_proc->data = 0;
+	printk("Ok.\n");
+}
+
+static inline void findvma_stat_inc_cachehit(void)
+{
+	spin_lock(&findvma_stat_lock);
+	if (!findvma_stat_proc)
+		findvma_stat_init();
+	findvma_stat_cachehit++;
+	spin_unlock(&findvma_stat_lock);
+}
+
+static inline void findvma_stat_inc_cachemiss(void)
+{
+	spin_lock(&findvma_stat_lock);
+	if (!findvma_stat_proc)
+		findvma_stat_init();
+	findvma_stat_cachemiss++;
+	spin_unlock(&findvma_stat_lock);
+}
+
+
+static inline void findvma_stat_inc_fail(void)
+{
+	spin_lock(&findvma_stat_lock);
+	if (unlikely(!findvma_stat_proc))
+		findvma_stat_init();
+	findvma_stat_fail++;
+	spin_unlock(&findvma_stat_lock);
+}
+
+#else /* MMAP_FINDVMA_STATS */
+# define findvma_stat_inc_cachehit()	do { } while (0)
+# define findvma_stat_inc_cachemiss()	do { } while (0)
+# define findvma_stat_inc_fail()	do { } while (0)
+#endif /* MMAP_FINDVMA_STATS */
+
 /* Look up the first VMA which satisfies  addr < vm_end,  NULL if none. */
 struct vm_area_struct * find_vma(struct mm_struct * mm, unsigned long addr)
 {
@@ -1275,10 +1399,15 @@ struct vm_area_struct * find_vma(struct 
 				} else
 					rb_node = rb_node->rb_right;
 			}
-			if (vma)
+			if (vma) {
 				mm->mmap_cache = vma;
-		}
+				findvma_stat_inc_cachemiss();
+			}
+		} else
+			findvma_stat_inc_cachehit();
 	}
+	if (!vma)
+		findvma_stat_inc_fail();
 	return vma;
 }
 

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2004-11-21 10:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-11-21  9:54 Michael Buesch [this message]
2004-11-22  7:10 ` Nick Piggin
2004-11-23 13:01   ` Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200411211054.53560.mbuesch@freenet.de \
    --to=mbuesch@freenet.de \
    --cc=Linux-MM@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox