From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>
To: "Luciano A. Stertz" <luciano@tteng.com.br>
Cc: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Page allocator doubt]
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2004 19:21:01 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041111212101.GA18822@logos.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4193CA1B.1090409@tteng.com.br>
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 06:22:51PM -0200, Luciano A. Stertz wrote:
> Dave Hansen wrote:
> >On Thu, 2004-11-11 at 11:27, Luciano A. Stertz wrote:
> >
> >> But... are they allocated to me, even with page_count zeroed? Do I
> >> need to do get_page on the them? Sorry if it's a too lame question, but I
> >>still didn't understand and found no place to read about this.
> >
> >
> >Do you see anywhere in the page allocator where it does a loop like
> >yours?
> >
> > for (i = 1; i< 1<<order; i++)
> > get_page(page + i);
> Actually this loop isn't mine. It's part of the page allocator, but
> it's only executed on systems without a MMU.
>
> >When you do a multi-order allocation, the first page represents the
> >whole group and they're treated as a whole. As you've noticed, breaking
> >them up requires a little work.
> >
> >Why don't you post all of the code that you're using so that we can tell
> >what you're doing? There might be a better way. Drivers probably
> >shouldn't be putting stuff in the page cache all by themselves.
> Unhappily I can't post any code yet, but I'll try to give an insight
> of what we're trying to do.
> It's not a driver. We're doing an implementation to allow the kernel
> to execute compressed files, decompressing pages on demand.
> These files will usually be compressed in small blocks, typically
> 4kb. But if they got compressed in blocks bigger then a page (say 8kb
> blocks on a 4kb page system), the kernel will have more than one
> decompressed page each time a block have to be decompressed; and I'd like
> to add them both to the page cache.
> So, seems I would have to break multi-order allocated pages. Is this
> possible / viable? If not, maybe I'll have to work only with small
> blocks, but I wouldn't like to...
Why do you need the pages to be physically contiguous?
I dont see any reason for that requirement - you can use discontiguous physical
pages which are virtually contiguous (so your decompression code wont need to
care about non adjacent pieces of memory).
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-11 21:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-11 14:37 Luciano A. Stertz
2004-11-11 19:10 ` Dave Hansen
2004-11-11 19:27 ` Luciano A. Stertz
2004-11-11 19:36 ` Dave Hansen
2004-11-11 20:22 ` Luciano A. Stertz
2004-11-11 20:34 ` Dave Hansen
2004-11-11 21:21 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2004-11-12 11:37 ` Luciano A. Stertz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041111212101.GA18822@logos.cnet \
--to=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=luciano@tteng.com.br \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox