From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2004 04:12:24 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] merge fs/hugetlb into mm/hugetlb.c Message-Id: <20041022041224.79053e71.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20041022110338.GA16122@lst.de> References: <20041022104330.GA15769@lst.de> <20041022035653.71565baa.akpm@osdl.org> <20041022110338.GA16122@lst.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: wli@holomorphy.com, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 22, 2004 at 03:56:53AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > > > > > > Having the common hugetlb code split over two files is rather confusing. > > > Let's keep everything in a single file, ala tmpfs, and also remove the > > > superflous HUGETLBFS that was implied by HUGETLB_PAGE. > > > > Probably a sane change, but it would seriously screw over Chris Lameter. > > Later? > > the demand paging thing? it'll need some more work first anyway. > It'll need a shitload of work if we move all the files around when he's not looking. Later, please. Yours is just a three-minute patch, no? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org