From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: andrea@novell.com, shaggy@austin.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zap_pte_range should not mark non-uptodate pages dirty
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 17:15:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041021171558.3214cea4.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041021164245.4abec5d2.akpm@osdl.org>
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> wrote:
>
> I don't get it. invalidate has the pageframe. All it need to do is to
> lock the page, examine mapcount and if it's non-zero, do the shootdown.
unmap_mapping_range() will do that - can call it one page at a time, or
batch up runs of pages. It's not fast, but presumably not frequent either.
The bigger problem is shooting down the buffer_heads. It's certainly the
case that mpage_readpage() will call block_read_full_page() which will then
bring the page uptodate without performing any I/O.
And invalidating the buffer_heads in invalidate_inode_pages2() is tricky -
we need to enter the filesystem and I'm not sure that either
->invalidatepage() or ->releasepage() are quite suitable. For a start,
they're best-effort and may fail. If we just go and mark the buffers not
uptodate we'll probably give ext3 a heart attack, so careful work would be
needed there.
Let's go back to why we needed all of this. Was it just for the NFS
something-changed-on-the-server code? If so, would it be sufficient to add
a new invalidate_inode_pages3() just for NFS, which clears the uptodate
bit? Or something along those lines?
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-22 0:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-21 21:15 Dave Kleikamp
2004-10-21 21:45 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-21 22:36 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-10-21 23:02 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-21 23:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-10-21 23:42 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-22 0:15 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2004-10-22 0:41 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-10-22 2:51 ` Rik van Riel
2004-10-22 16:19 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-10-22 0:30 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-10-22 1:22 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-10-22 2:03 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-22 16:17 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-10-22 17:04 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-10-22 23:24 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-25 13:58 ` Dave Kleikamp
2004-10-26 0:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-11-09 14:15 ` Dave Kleikamp
2004-11-09 14:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-11-09 19:51 ` Andrew Morton
2004-11-09 19:46 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041021171558.3214cea4.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=andrea@novell.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=shaggy@austin.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox