From: Hirokazu Takahashi <taka@valinux.co.jp>
To: trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no
Cc: marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com, iwamoto@valinux.co.jp,
haveblue@us.ibm.com, akpm@osdl.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
piggin@cyberone.com.au, arjanv@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] memory defragmentation to satisfy high order allocations
Date: Mon, 04 Oct 2004 22:02:07 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041004.220207.10904358.taka@valinux.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1096836249.9667.100.camel@lade.trondhjem.org>
Hello,
Yes, I know what you're talking about.
The current kernel doesn't have any features about it.
So that I've been wondering if there might be any good solution
to help memory hot-removal. It would be nice if there were support
from filesystems and block devices.
> > However, while network is down network/cluster filesystems might not
> > release pages forever unlike in the case of block devices, which may
> > timeout or returns a error in case of failure.
>
> Where is the difference? As far as the VM is concerned, it is a latency
> problem. The fact of whether or not it is a permanent hang, a hang with
> a long timeout, or just a slow device is irrelevant because the VM
> doesn't actually know about these devices.
>
> > Each filesystem can control what the migration code does.
> > If it doesn't have anything to help memory migration, it's possible
> > to wait for the network coming up before starting memory migration,
> > or give up it if the network happen to be down. That's no problem.
>
> Wrong. It *is* a problem: Filesystems aren't required to know anything
> about the particulars of the underlying block/network/... device timeout
> semantics either.
>
> Think, for instance about EXT2. Where in the current code do you see
> that it is required to detect that it is running on top of something
> like the NBD device? Where does it figure out what the latencies of this
> device is?
>
> AFAICS, most filesystems in linux/fs/* have no knowledge whatsoever
> about the underlying block/network/... devices and their timeout values.
> Basing your decision about whether or not you need to manage high
> latency situations just by inspecting the filesystem type is therefore
> not going to give very reliable results.
Thank you,
Hirokazu Takahashi.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-04 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-01 18:22 Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-01 20:11 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-01 19:04 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-01 21:00 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-01 21:57 ` Dave Hansen
2004-10-01 23:42 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-02 1:17 ` Andrew Morton
2004-10-02 9:30 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2004-10-02 18:33 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-03 4:13 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2004-10-03 14:07 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-03 18:35 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2004-10-03 19:21 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-10-03 20:03 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2004-10-03 20:44 ` Trond Myklebust
2004-10-04 13:02 ` Hirokazu Takahashi [this message]
2004-10-04 17:24 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-05 2:53 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2004-10-07 12:06 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-08 7:00 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2004-10-08 10:00 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-08 12:23 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2004-10-08 12:41 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-08 16:52 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2004-10-08 15:36 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-12 10:56 ` IWAMOTO Toshihiro
2004-10-12 10:35 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-12 17:55 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2004-10-12 14:26 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-10-12 12:17 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-12 15:01 ` Dave Hansen
2004-10-04 3:24 ` IWAMOTO Toshihiro
2004-10-04 2:22 ` Dave Hansen
2004-10-05 16:46 ` [PATCH] mhp: transfer dirty tag at radix_tree_replace Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-05 18:35 ` Dave Hansen
2004-10-06 7:39 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2004-10-08 8:15 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2004-10-08 20:36 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-04 4:09 ` [RFC] memory defragmentation to satisfy high order allocations IWAMOTO Toshihiro
2004-10-04 17:29 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-02 2:30 ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-02 3:08 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-04 8:15 ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-02 2:41 ` Nick Piggin
2004-10-02 3:50 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2004-10-02 16:06 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-04 2:38 ` Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
2004-10-04 17:32 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-04 6:58 ` Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
2004-10-07 15:58 ` memory hotplug and mem= Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-07 18:36 ` Dave Hansen
2004-10-07 17:01 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-10-07 19:10 ` Dave Hansen
2004-10-07 20:25 ` Dave Hansen
2004-10-11 16:40 [RFC] memory defragmentation to satisfy high order allocations linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041004.220207.10904358.taka@valinux.co.jp \
--to=taka@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjanv@redhat.com \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=iwamoto@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
--cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox