From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2004 13:06:58 -0300 From: Marcelo Tosatti Subject: Re: [RFC] memory defragmentation to satisfy high order allocations Message-ID: <20041002160658.GC7501@logos.cnet> References: <20041001182221.GA3191@logos.cnet> <415E154A.2040209@cyberone.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <415E154A.2040209@cyberone.com.au> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nick Piggin Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, akpm@osdl.org, arjanv@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Oct 02, 2004 at 12:41:14PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > >For example it doesnt re establishes pte's once it has unmapped them. > > > > > > Another thing - I don't know if I'd bother re-establishing ptes.... > I'd say just leave it to happen lazily at fault time. Indeed it should work lazily. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org