linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>
To: Con Kolivas <kernel@kolivas.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
	raybry@sgi.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	riel@redhat.com, piggin@cyberone.com.au, mbligh@aracnet.com
Subject: Re: swapping and the value of /proc/sys/vm/swappiness
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2004 23:18:16 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040908021816.GB2942@logos.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040907212051.GC3492@logos.cnet>

> Spent some time doing a few tests.
> 
> A contained test (512MB box, allocate 450MB of memory, touch and sleep + 
> huge dd) show's that 2.6.6 and 2.6.7 are equivalent (swapout 120-150M when the "dd" 
> starts writing out data).
> 
> 2.6.9-rc1 swaps out 350M on the same test. Doenst seem nice, I'll try to isolate 
> what causes this tomorrow (this is probably what is hitting desktop users which
> is fixed by Con's patches). Thats problem #1. Something needs a little tweaking 
> I think. 
> 
> Ray, I see the additional swapouts increase the dd performance for your particular testcase:
> 
> on 2.6.6:
>         Total I/O   Avg Swap   min    max     pg cache    min    max
>        ----------- --------- ------- ------  --------- ------- -------
>    0   242.47 MB/s      0 MB (     0,     0)   3195 MB (  3138,  3266)
>   20   256.06 MB/s      0 MB (     0,     0)   3170 MB (  3074,  3234)
>   40   267.29 MB/s      0 MB (     0,     0)   3189 MB (  3137,  3234)
>   60   289.43 MB/s    666 MB (    72,  1680)   3847 MB (  3296,  4817)		<---------- 
> 
> So for this one testcase it is being beneficial. 
> 
> However, decreasing the "swappiness" value does not seem to make much of a difference:
> 
> Kernel Version 2.6.8.1-mm4:
>         Total I/O   Avg Swap   min    max     pg cache    min    max
>        ----------- --------- ------- ------  --------- ------- -------
>    0   287.28 MB/s    710 MB (    46,  3060)   4082 MB (  3426,  6308)
>   20   288.05 MB/s    508 MB (    94,  1417)   3848 MB (  3442,  4739)
>   40   287.03 MB/s    588 MB (   199,  1251)   3909 MB (  3570,  4515)
>   60   290.08 MB/s    640 MB (   210,  1190)   3976 MB (  3538,  4531)
>   80   287.73 MB/s    693 MB (   316,  1195)   4049 MB (  3713,  4545)
>  100   166.17 MB/s  26001 MB ( 26001, 26002)  28798 MB ( 28740, 28852)
>                                                                                                                                                                                    
> Kernel Version 2.6.9-rc1-mm3:
>         Total I/O   Avg Swap   min    max     pg cache    min    max
>        ----------- --------- ------- ------  --------- ------- -------
>    0   274.80 MB/s  10511 MB (  5644, 14492)  13293 MB (  8596, 17156)
>   20   267.02 MB/s  12624 MB (  5578, 16287)  15298 MB (  8468, 18889)
>   40   267.66 MB/s  13541 MB (  6619, 17461)  16199 MB (  9393, 20044)
>   60   233.73 MB/s  18094 MB ( 16550, 19676)  20629 MB ( 19103, 22192)
>   80   213.64 MB/s  20950 MB ( 15844, 22977)  23450 MB ( 18496, 25440)
>  100   164.58 MB/s  26004 MB ( 26004, 26004)  28410 MB ( 28327, 28455)
> 
> And that is a problem #2 - swappinness not being honoured. Guys, 
> any ideas on the reason for that?

Hum I just tested it on my 512MB box and swappiness is working fine on 2.6.8.. (it
has expected effects), unlike Ray's tests.

> 
> Andrew, dirty_ratio and dirty_background_ratio (as low as 5% each) did not significantly 
> affect the amount of swapped out data, only a small effect on _how soon_ anonymous 
> memory was swapped out.
> 
> And finally, Ray, the difference you see between 2.6.6 and 2.6.7 can be explained, 
> as noted by others in this thread, to vmscan.c changes (page replacement/scanning policy
> changes were made).
> 
> Will continue with more tests tomorrow.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2004-09-08  2:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-09-06 19:11 Ray Bryant
2004-09-06 20:10 ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-06 21:22   ` Ray Bryant
2004-09-06 21:36     ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-06 22:37     ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-06 23:51       ` Nick Piggin
2004-09-07  0:31         ` Ray Bryant
2004-09-06 22:48 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-06 23:09 ` Con Kolivas
2004-09-06 23:27   ` Andrew Morton
2004-09-06 23:34     ` Con Kolivas
2004-09-07  0:03       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-09-07  1:34         ` Con Kolivas
2004-09-07 10:38         ` Nick Piggin
2004-09-07 10:56           ` Con Kolivas
2004-09-08 16:45             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-09-09  1:12               ` Con Kolivas
2004-09-07 17:03           ` Ray Bryant
2004-09-07 21:20         ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-09-08  2:18           ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2004-09-08 14:20           ` Ray Bryant
2004-09-08 16:54             ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-09-08 19:35               ` Ray Bryant
2004-09-08 19:30                 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-09-09  3:06                   ` Ray Bryant
2004-09-09  2:14                     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-09-09 14:21                       ` Ray Bryant
2004-09-09  3:09                     ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-09 14:16                       ` Ray Bryant
2004-09-09 17:23                         ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-09-28  1:54                       ` Ray Bryant
2004-09-28  3:36                         ` Nick Piggin
2004-09-29  0:36                           ` Nick Piggin
2004-09-29  4:23                             ` Ray Bryant
2004-09-30 17:15                             ` Ray Bryant
2004-09-08 17:31             ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-09-08 18:04               ` Rik van Riel
2004-09-08 19:50                 ` Diego Calleja
2004-09-08 21:10                   ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-09-08 21:55                     ` Diego Calleja
2004-09-08 22:20                       ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-09-08 23:22                         ` Rik van Riel
2004-09-08 22:28                     ` Alan Cox
2004-09-08 23:42                       ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-09-08 19:54               ` Ray Bryant
2004-09-08 15:19           ` Ray Bryant

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040908021816.GB2942@logos.cnet \
    --to=marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=kernel@kolivas.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    --cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
    --cc=raybry@sgi.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox