From: Hirokazu Takahashi <taka@valinux.co.jp>
To: kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com
Cc: wli@holomorphy.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Lhms-devel] Re: [RFC] free_area[] bitmap elimination [0/3]
Date: Sat, 21 Aug 2004 13:56:24 +0900 (JST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040821.135624.74737461.taka@valinux.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040821025543.GS11200@holomorphy.com>
Hello,
I also impressed by your patch.
In my understanding, the patch assumes that size of mem_map[] in each
zone must be multiple of 2^MAX_ORDER, right?
But it doesn't seem it's a big problem, as we can just allocate extra
mem_map[] to round up if it isn't.
> On Sat, Aug 21, 2004 at 11:31:21AM +0900, Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA wrote:
> > This patch removes bitmap from buddy allocator used in
> > alloc_pages()/free_pages() in the kernel 2.6.8.1.
> > Currently, Linux's page allocator uses bitmaps to record an order
> > of a free page.
> > This patch removes bitmap from buddy allocator, and uses
> > page->private field to record an order of a page.
> > My purpose is to reduce complexity of buddy allocator, when we want to
> > hotplug memory. For memory hotplug, we have to resize memory management
> > structures. Major two of them are mem_map and bitmap.If this patch removes
> > bitmap from buddy allocator, resizeing bitmap will be needless.
> > I tested this patch on my small PC box(Celeron900MHz,256MB memory)
> > and a server machine(Xeon x 2, 4GB memory).
>
> Complexity maybe. But one serious issue this addresses beyond the needs
> of hotplug memory is that the buddy bitmaps are a heavily random-access
> data structures not used elsewhere. Consolidating them into the page
> structures should improve cache locality and motivate this patch beyond
> just the needs of hotplug memory. Furthermore, the patch also reduces
> the kernel's overall memory footprint by a small amount.
Agreed.
> However, I'm concerned about the effectiveness of this specific
> algorithm for coalescing. A more detailed description may help explain
> why the effectiveness of coalescing is preserved.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-21 4:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-21 2:31 Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
2004-08-21 2:55 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-21 4:56 ` Hirokazu Takahashi [this message]
2004-08-21 5:21 ` [Lhms-devel] " William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-21 5:37 ` Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
2004-08-21 5:37 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-21 6:10 ` Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
2004-08-21 17:48 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-21 5:00 ` Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
2004-08-21 5:01 ` [Lhms-devel] " Hirokazu Takahashi
2004-08-21 5:26 ` Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
2004-08-21 5:01 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-08-21 9:43 ` Nigel Cunningham
2004-08-23 14:36 ` [Lhms-devel] " Dave Hansen
2004-08-23 15:00 ` Dave Hansen
2004-08-24 0:07 ` [Lhms-devel] " Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
2004-08-24 0:00 ` [Lhms-devel] " Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
2004-08-24 2:28 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2004-08-24 2:49 ` Dave Hansen
2004-08-24 3:31 ` Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
2004-08-23 15:43 ` Dave Hansen
2004-08-24 0:15 ` Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040821.135624.74737461.taka@valinux.co.jp \
--to=taka@valinux.co.jp \
--cc=kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox