From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 09:49:41 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III Subject: Re: [proc.txt] Fix /proc/pid/statm documentation Message-ID: <20040806164941.GN17188@holomorphy.com> References: <1091754711.1231.2388.camel@cube> <20040806094037.GB11358@k3.hellgate.ch> <1091797122.1231.2452.camel@cube> <20040806154834.GL17188@holomorphy.com> <1091801683.1231.2467.camel@cube> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1091801683.1231.2467.camel@cube> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Albert Cahalan Cc: Roger Luethi , linux-kernel mailing list , linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, 2004-08-06 at 11:48, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> Could you describe those in isolation from other issues? On Fri, Aug 06, 2004 at 10:14:43AM -0400, Albert Cahalan wrote: > Whatever Roger found, plus: > 1. trs == text RESIDENT size > 2. drs == data RESIDENT size > 3. memory-mapped devices should be counted for only 1 file > (use an old Linux box running X to see) > I'm not terribly concerned right now. I just don't think > it's OK to go ripping out statm over a few bugs. > If we ripped out every buggy piece of kernel code, we'd > have a 0-byte kernel. > There are far bigger issues elsewhere, like %CPU. Okay, can you give precise definitions of trs and drs? -- wli -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org