From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 22:19:58 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] 1/4: rework alloc_pages Message-Id: <20040805221958.49049229.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <41130FB1.5020001@yahoo.com.au> References: <41130FB1.5020001@yahoo.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Nick Piggin Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Nick Piggin wrote: > > Previously the ->protection[] logic was broken. It was difficult to follow > and basically didn't use the asynch reclaim watermarks properly. eh? Broken how? What is an "asynch reclaim watermark"? > This one uses ->protection only for lower-zone protection, and gives the > allocator flexibility to add the watermarks as desired. eh? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org