From: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
To: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH] Locking optimization for cache_reap
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 14:05:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040723190555.GB16956@sgi.com> (raw)
Here is another cache_reap optimization that reduces latency when
applied after the 'Move cache_reap out of timer context' patch I
submitted on 7/14 (for inclusion in -mm next week).
This applies to 2.6.8-rc2 + the above mentioned patch.
Signed-off-by: Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@sgi.com>
Index: linux/mm/slab.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/mm/slab.c
+++ linux/mm/slab.c
@@ -2619,27 +2619,6 @@ static void enable_cpucache (kmem_cache_
cachep->name, -err);
}
-static void drain_array(kmem_cache_t *cachep, struct array_cache *ac)
-{
- int tofree;
-
- check_irq_off();
- if (ac->touched) {
- ac->touched = 0;
- } else if (ac->avail) {
- tofree = (ac->limit+4)/5;
- if (tofree > ac->avail) {
- tofree = (ac->avail+1)/2;
- }
- spin_lock(&cachep->spinlock);
- free_block(cachep, ac_entry(ac), tofree);
- spin_unlock(&cachep->spinlock);
- ac->avail -= tofree;
- memmove(&ac_entry(ac)[0], &ac_entry(ac)[tofree],
- sizeof(void*)*ac->avail);
- }
-}
-
static void drain_array_locked(kmem_cache_t *cachep,
struct array_cache *ac, int force)
{
@@ -2697,16 +2676,14 @@ static void cache_reap (void *unused)
goto next;
check_irq_on();
- local_irq_disable();
- drain_array(searchp, ac_data(searchp));
- if(time_after(searchp->lists.next_reap, jiffies))
- goto next_irqon;
+ spin_lock_irq(&searchp->spinlock);
+
+ drain_array_locked(searchp, ac_data(searchp), 0);
- spin_lock(&searchp->spinlock);
- if(time_after(searchp->lists.next_reap, jiffies)) {
+ if(time_after(searchp->lists.next_reap, jiffies))
goto next_unlock;
- }
+
searchp->lists.next_reap = jiffies + REAPTIMEOUT_LIST3;
if (searchp->lists.shared)
@@ -2739,9 +2716,7 @@ static void cache_reap (void *unused)
spin_lock_irq(&searchp->spinlock);
} while(--tofree > 0);
next_unlock:
- spin_unlock(&searchp->spinlock);
-next_irqon:
- local_irq_enable();
+ spin_unlock_irq(&searchp->spinlock);
next:
;
}
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next reply other threads:[~2004-07-23 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-23 19:05 Dimitri Sivanich [this message]
2004-07-27 1:01 ` Andrew Morton
2004-07-27 1:47 ` Dimitri Sivanich
2004-07-27 1:59 ` Aroop MP
[not found] ` <20040727020338.GB23967@sgi.com>
2004-07-27 2:11 ` lsattr: Inappropriate ioctl for device While reading flags!!! Aroop MP
2004-07-27 6:40 ` Philippe Troin
2004-07-27 2:01 ` [PATCH] Locking optimization for cache_reap Dimitri Sivanich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040723190555.GB16956@sgi.com \
--to=sivanich@sgi.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lse-tech@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox