linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yasunori Goto <ygoto@us.fujitsu.com>
To: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel ML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Hotplug Memory Support <lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	Linux-Node-Hotplug <lhns-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	"BRADLEY CHRISTIANSEN [imap]" <bradc1@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Lhns-devel] Merging Nonlinear and Numa style memory hotplug
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 20:04:48 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040623184303.25D9.YGOTO@us.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1088029973.28102.269.camel@nighthawk>

> This quadruples the size of the mem_section[] array, and makes each
> mem_section entry take up a whole cache line.  Are you sure all of these
> structure members are needed?  

No, I'm not sure. Especially, I don't find whether hotremovable
attribute is necessary or not in the mem_section yet.

> Can they be allocated elsewhere, instead
> of directly inside the translation tables, or otherwise derived?  Also,
> why does the booked/free_count have to be kept here?  Can't that be
> determined by simply looping through and looking at all the pages'
> flags?

It might be OK. But there might be some other influence by it 
(for example, new lock will be necessary in alloc_pages()...).
I think measurement is necessary to find which implementation
is the fastest. If I will have a time, I would like to try it.

> Also, can you provide a patch which is just your modifications to Dave's
> original nonlinear patch?

No, I don't have it (at least now).
Base of my patches is Iwamoto-san's patch which is for 2.6.5.
But Dave-san's patch is for linux-2.6.5-mm. So, I had to change
Dave-san's patch for it.

And, other difference thing is about mem_map.
Dave-san's patch divides virtual address of mem_map per mem_section.
But it is cause of increasing steps at 'buddy allocator' like this.
  
  - buddy1 = base + (page_idx ^ -mask);
  - buddy2 = base + page_idx;
  + buddy1 = pfn_to_page(base + (page_idx ^ -mask);
  + buddy2 = pfn_to_page(base + page_idx);

So, I would like to try contiguous virtual mem_map yet,
if it is possible.

> Instead of remove_from_freelist(unsigned int section), I'd hope that we
> could support a much more generic interface in the page allocator:
> allocate by physical address.  remove_from_freelist() has some intimate
> knowledge of the buddy allocator that I think is a bit complex.  

I don't think I understand your idea at this point.
If booked pages remain in free_list, page allocator has to
search many pages which include booked pages.
remove_from_reelist() is to avoid this.

Thank you for your responce.

Bye.

-- 
Yasunori Goto <ygoto at us.fujitsu.com>


--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2004-06-24  3:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-22 19:00 Yasunori Goto
2004-06-23 22:32 ` [Lhns-devel] " Dave Hansen
2004-06-24  3:04   ` Yasunori Goto [this message]
2004-06-24  3:26     ` Dave Hansen
2004-06-24 13:28     ` [Lhms-devel] " Dave Hansen
2004-06-24 22:19       ` Yasunori Goto
2004-06-24 22:37         ` Dave Hansen
2004-06-25  3:11           ` [Lhms-devel] " Yasunori Goto
2004-06-25  3:19             ` Dave Hansen
2004-06-25 18:48               ` Yasunori Goto
2004-06-25 18:59                 ` Dave Hansen
2004-06-25 20:45                   ` Yasunori Goto
2004-06-25 20:49                     ` Dave Hansen
2004-06-25 20:54                     ` Dave Hansen
2004-06-25  4:49         ` [Lhms-devel] Re: [Lhns-devel] " Shai Fultheim
2004-06-25 15:16           ` Dave Hansen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040623184303.25D9.YGOTO@us.fujitsu.com \
    --to=ygoto@us.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=bradc1@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=lhns-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox