From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
hugh@veritas.com, vrajesh@umich.edu,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] radix priority search tree - objrmap complexity fix
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 17:20:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040403152026.GE2307@dualathlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040403094058.A13091@infradead.org>
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 09:40:58AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 10:35:14PM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > how can that be the second one? (I deduced it was the first one because
> > it cannot be the second one and the offset didn't look at the very end
> > of the function). This is the second one:
> >
> > if (!PageCompound(p))
> > bad_page(__FUNCTION__, p);
> >
> > but bad_page shows p->flags == 0x00080008 and 1<<PG_compound ==
> > 0x80000.
> >
> > So PG_compound is definitely set for "p" and it can't be the second one
> > triggering.
> >
> > Can you double check? Maybe we should double check the asm. Something
> > sounds fundamentally wrong in the asm, sounds like a miscompilation,
> > which compiler are you using?
>
> Because I didn't trust my ppc assembly reading that much I put in a printk
> and it's actually the third bad_page(), sorry.
ok no problem, so page->private got screwed. I cannot see what could
change page->private though. I should also have noticed myself that
page->private was wrong: 0xc07721ff is not a 4byte aligned address, that
explains the weird page count too, since page_count follows
page->private to return the page->count of the master page.
I've no idea what could set page->private to such a weird address. the
"p" page is at address c0772380, that seems sane, the page->flags and
page->mapping as well are sane (p->count cannot be seen, what we see is
p->private->count), only page->private is screwed apparently.
if you want you can give a spin to this patch. As far as the old code
worked (i.e. with hugetlbfs=n) this should work too, since it disables
the compound feature completely, but if it works it probably only hides
the real bug. You can use rc3-aa3 for this (it already has the latest
robustness fixes I posted to you)
--- x/mm/page_alloc.c.~1~ 2004-04-02 20:37:14.000000000 +0200
+++ x/mm/page_alloc.c 2004-04-03 17:15:52.647449336 +0200
@@ -563,7 +563,9 @@ __alloc_pages(unsigned int gfp_mask, uns
cold = 0;
if (gfp_mask & __GFP_COLD)
cold = __GFP_COLD;
+#if 0
if (gfp_mask & __GFP_NO_COMP)
+#endif
cold |= __GFP_NO_COMP;
zones = zonelist->zones; /* the list of zones suitable for gfp_mask */
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-03 15:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 92+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.44.0403150527400.28579-100000@localhost.localdomain>
2004-03-21 22:10 ` Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
2004-03-21 22:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] Dave & Hugh's objrmap patch Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
2004-03-21 22:13 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] Covert objrmap to use prio_tree Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
2004-03-21 22:26 ` URL typo Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
2004-03-22 0:46 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] radix priority search tree - objrmap complexity fix Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-22 2:32 ` Rik van Riel
2004-03-22 3:49 ` Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
2004-03-22 4:02 ` Rik van Riel
2004-03-25 22:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-26 4:06 ` Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
2004-03-26 7:53 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-26 15:43 ` Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
2004-03-26 17:58 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-27 19:51 ` Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
2004-03-29 17:22 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-29 17:50 ` Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
2004-03-29 18:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-29 20:40 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-29 22:24 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-03-29 22:54 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-29 23:08 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-03-29 22:39 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-29 22:42 ` Andrew Morton
2004-03-31 15:07 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-31 15:26 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-31 16:45 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-03-31 17:28 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-01 0:45 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-01 1:22 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-01 1:26 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-01 1:51 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-01 2:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-01 5:05 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-04-01 13:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-01 15:09 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-01 15:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-02 0:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-02 0:52 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-02 1:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-02 1:03 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-04-02 1:16 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-02 1:36 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-02 2:00 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-02 2:08 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-02 2:22 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-02 6:05 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-02 7:07 ` Paul Mackerras
2004-04-02 7:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-02 15:28 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-02 15:22 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-02 15:27 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-02 15:38 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-02 15:45 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-02 9:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-02 10:21 ` Marc-Christian Petersen
2004-04-02 10:55 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-04-02 16:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-02 18:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-02 19:29 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-02 19:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-02 20:35 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-03 8:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-03 15:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2004-04-03 15:59 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-03 17:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-05 9:59 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-05 12:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-05 16:08 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-06 4:22 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-06 4:43 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-06 5:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-06 21:54 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 1:39 ` Nathan Scott
2004-04-06 5:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-06 16:01 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-07 1:33 ` Nathan Scott
2004-04-03 17:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-03 20:02 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-03 23:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-03 23:46 ` Andrew Morton
2004-04-04 0:40 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-02 20:13 ` Pavel Machek
2004-04-02 21:42 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-04-02 21:45 ` Pavel Machek
2004-04-02 21:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-29 18:12 ` Hugh Dickins
2004-03-29 18:20 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-29 18:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-04-05 3:14 ` Rajesh Venkatasubramanian
2004-04-05 4:42 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2004-03-26 12:26 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-03-26 19:18 ` Andrea Arcangeli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040403152026.GE2307@dualathlon.random \
--to=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=hugh@veritas.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=vrajesh@umich.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox