From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 07:05:25 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/3] radix priority search tree - objrmap complexity fix Message-ID: <20040402070525.A31581@infradead.org> References: <20040402001535.GG18585@dualathlon.random> <20040402011627.GK18585@dualathlon.random> <20040401173649.22f734cd.akpm@osdl.org> <20040402020022.GN18585@dualathlon.random> <20040401180802.219ece99.akpm@osdl.org> <20040402022233.GQ18585@dualathlon.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040402022233.GQ18585@dualathlon.random>; from andrea@suse.de on Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 04:22:33AM +0200 Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Andrew Morton , hugh@veritas.com, vrajesh@umich.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 04:22:33AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > Well, I doubt anybody could take advantage of this optimization, since > nobody can ship with hugetlbfs disabled anyways (peraphs with the > exception of the embedded people but then I doubt they want to risk Common. stop smoking that bad stuff. Almost non-one except the known oracle whores SuSE and RH need it. Remeber Linux is used much more widely except the known "Enterprise" vendors. None of the NAS/networking/media applicances or pdas I've seen has the slightest need for hugetlbfs. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org