From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 11:14:16 -0800 From: "Paul E. McKenney" Subject: Re: [RFC] Distributed mmap API Message-ID: <20040225191416.GE1397@us.ibm.com> Reply-To: paulmck@us.ibm.com References: <20040216190927.GA2969@us.ibm.com> <200402211400.16779.phillips@arcor.de> <20040222233911.GB1311@us.ibm.com> <200402251604.19040.phillips@arcor.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200402251604.19040.phillips@arcor.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Daniel Phillips Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" , Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel , linux-mm List-ID: On Wed, Feb 25, 2004 at 04:04:19PM -0500, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > I'd like to take this opportunity to apologize to Paul for derailing his more > modest proposal, but unfortunately, the semantics that could be obtained that > way are fatally flawed: private mmaps just won't work. What I've written here > is about the minimum that supports acceptable mmap semantics. No problem -- it looks like we are getting a much better result than I was proposing, thank you for helping me to see the light! Thanx, Paul -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org