From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Phillips Subject: Re: Non-GPL export of invalidate_mmap_range Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:00:32 -0500 References: <20040216190927.GA2969@us.ibm.com> <200402201535.47848.phillips@arcor.de> <20040220140116.GD1269@us.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <20040220140116.GD1269@us.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200402201800.12077.phillips@arcor.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: paulmck@us.ibm.com Cc: "Stephen C. Tweedie" , Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig , linux-kernel , linux-mm List-ID: On Friday 20 February 2004 09:01, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 03:37:26PM -0500, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > Actually, I erred there in that invalidate_mmap_range should not export > > the flag, because it never makes sense to pass in non-zero from a DFS. > > Doesn't vmtruncate() want to pass non-zero "all" in to > invalidate_mmap_range() in order to maintain compatibility with existing > Linux semantics? That comes from inside. The DFS's truncate interface should just be vmtruncate. If I missed something, please shout. Regards, Daniel -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org