From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:11:17 +0100 From: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: Non-GPL export of invalidate_mmap_range Message-ID: <20040219111116.GA16733@devserv.devel.redhat.com> References: <20040217073522.A25921@infradead.org> <20040217124001.GA1267@us.ibm.com> <20040217161929.7e6b2a61.akpm@osdl.org> <1077108694.4479.4.camel@laptop.fenrus.com> <20040218140021.GB1269@us.ibm.com> <20040218211035.A13866@infradead.org> <20040218150607.GE1269@us.ibm.com> <20040218222138.A14585@infradead.org> <20040218145132.460214b5.akpm@osdl.org> <20040219102900.GC14000@marowsky-bree.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040219102900.GC14000@marowsky-bree.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Lars Marowsky-Bree Cc: Andrew Morton , Christoph Hellwig , paulmck@us.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 11:29:00AM +0100, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > > b) Does the IBM filsystem meet the kernel's licensing requirements? > > If you are worried about this one, you can export it GPL-only, which as > an Open Source developer I'd appreciate, but from a real-world business > perspective would be unhappy about ;-) It already is exported GPL-only, this is all about changing it to be for linking bin only modules as well... --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFANJnSxULwo51rQBIRAjxIAJ4gz33/PrBa8r0mMAS3KX8uufq0ggCgixbV aHMeoUmCUO2RHR+5XyF8Yy8= =/TvR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF-- -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org