From: Alok Mooley <rangdi@yahoo.com>
To: root@chaos.analogic.com
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>, Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: Active Memory Defragmentation: Our implementation & problems
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:18:29 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040204191829.57468.qmail@web9704.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.53.0402041402310.2722@chaos>
--- "Richard B. Johnson" <root@chaos.analogic.com> >
If this is an Intel x86 machine, it is impossible
> for pages
> to get fragmented in the first place. The hardware
> allows any
> page, from anywhere in memory, to be concatenated
> into linear
> virtual address space. Even the kernel address space
> is virtual.
> The only time you need physically-adjacent pages is
> if you
> are doing DMA that is more than a page-length at a
> time. The
> kernel keeps a bunch of those pages around for just
> that
> purpose.
>
> So, if you are making a "memory defragmenter", it is
> a CPU time-sink.
> That's all.
What if the external fragmentation increases so much
that it is not possible to find a large sized block?
Then, is it not better to defragment rather than swap
or fail?
-Alok
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free web site building tool. Try it!
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/ps/sb/
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-04 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-03 4:46 Alok Mooley
2004-02-03 21:26 ` Dave Hansen
2004-02-03 22:26 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-04 5:09 ` Alok Mooley
2004-02-04 5:24 ` Mike Fedyk
2004-02-04 5:54 ` Dave Hansen
2004-02-04 6:05 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-04 6:22 ` Dave Hansen
2004-02-04 6:29 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-04 6:40 ` Dave Hansen
2004-02-04 7:17 ` Martin J. Bligh
2004-02-04 8:30 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-04 6:53 ` Doubt about statm_pgd_range patch Arunkumar
2004-02-04 6:57 ` Active Memory Defragmentation: Our implementation & problems IWAMOTO Toshihiro
2004-02-04 7:10 ` Dave Hansen
2004-02-04 7:50 ` IWAMOTO Toshihiro
2004-02-04 10:33 ` Hirokazu Takahashi
2004-02-04 18:33 ` Alok Mooley
2004-02-04 18:46 ` Dave Hansen
2004-02-04 18:54 ` Alok Mooley
2004-02-04 19:07 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-04 19:18 ` Alok Mooley [this message]
2004-02-04 19:33 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-05 5:07 ` Alok Mooley
2004-02-05 19:03 ` Pavel Machek
2004-02-04 19:35 ` Dave McCracken
2004-02-04 21:59 ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-04 23:24 ` Dave Hansen
2004-02-05 16:32 ` Dave McCracken
2004-02-04 19:37 ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-04 19:43 ` Dave Hansen
2004-02-04 19:59 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-04 19:56 ` Dave Hansen
2004-02-05 5:19 ` Alok Mooley
2004-02-04 20:12 Mark_H_Johnson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040204191829.57468.qmail@web9704.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=rangdi@yahoo.com \
--cc=haveblue@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=root@chaos.analogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox