From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2003 22:56:11 -0800 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: load control demotion/promotion policy Message-Id: <20031221225611.5421b522.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20031221235541.GA22896@k3.hellgate.ch> References: <20031221235541.GA22896@k3.hellgate.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Roger Luethi Cc: riel@redhat.com, wli@holomorphy.com, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Roger Luethi wrote: > > Isn't there _anybody_ interested in > the fact that 2.6 performance completely breaks down under a light > overload where 2.4 doesn't and where load control would be more of a > problem than a solution? I am! But I have vague memories of being dazed and confused when last you tried to describe the causes. I was hoping that things would firm up a bit. Please, take the time to describe it to us again, exhaustively. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org