From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 22:36:02 -0800 From: Mike Fedyk Subject: Re: OOps! was: 2.6.0-test9-mm5 Message-ID: <20031125063602.GA1329@mis-mike-wstn.matchmail.com> References: <20031121121116.61db0160.akpm@osdl.org> <20031124225527.GB1343@mis-mike-wstn.matchmail.com> <20031124235807.GA1586@mis-mike-wstn.matchmail.com> <20031125003658.GA1342@mis-mike-wstn.matchmail.com> <20031125051018.GA1331@mis-mike-wstn.matchmail.com> <20031125054709.GC1331@mis-mike-wstn.matchmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Zwane Mwaikambo Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 12:54:49AM -0500, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > On Mon, 24 Nov 2003, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 25, 2003 at 12:33:47AM -0500, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: > > > Indeed it looks PnPBIOS related, i'll await your other tests. > > > > Ok, I'll get started compiling up some kernels. > > > > Am I right in thinking that the pnpbios patches are in a series, where I > > should revert 4, then 3, etc? > > Yes, that should do it. Whenever in doubt you can always refer to; Took a quick look at the patches, and since they don't modify the same parts of the same files, I'm backing them out in order of patch size. Reverted pnp-fix-2: Still OOpses. What do you want to bet that it's the smallest one? ;) -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org