* [PATCH] Minor rmap optimizations.
@ 2003-11-21 17:49 Martin Schwidefsky
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Martin Schwidefsky @ 2003-11-21 17:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-mm, linux-arch
Hi,
while working on my mm patch for s390 I played with rmap a bit, adding
BUG statements and the like. While doing so I noticed some room for
improvement in rmap. Its minor stuff but anyway...
The first observation is that the pte chain array doesn't have holes,
meaning that from the pte_chain_idx() of the first array every slot of
all following pte chain arrays are full. That is there can't be NULL
pointers. The "if (!pte_paddr)" check in try_to_unmap() can be removed
and if the loop in page_referenced() is started from pte_chain_idx(pc)
then the "if (!pte_paddr)" in page_referenced() can be removed as well.
The second observation is that the first pte array of a pte chain has
at least one entry. Empty pte chain arrays are always freed immediatly
after the last entry was removed. Because of that victim_i can be
calculated in a simpler way. Instead of setting victim_i to -1 and then
check in each loop iteration against -1 victim_i can just be set to
the pte_chain_idx of the first pte chain array.
blue skies,
Martin.
diffstat:
mm/rmap.c | 16 ++++------------
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff -urN linux-2.6/mm/rmap.c linux-2.6-s390/mm/rmap.c
--- linux-2.6/mm/rmap.c Sat Oct 25 20:44:44 2003
+++ linux-2.6-s390/mm/rmap.c Fri Nov 21 16:20:25 2003
@@ -132,12 +132,10 @@
for (pc = page->pte.chain; pc; pc = pte_chain_next(pc)) {
int i;
- for (i = NRPTE-1; i >= 0; i--) {
+ for (i = pte_chain_idx(pc); i < NRPTE; i++) {
pte_addr_t pte_paddr = pc->ptes[i];
pte_t *p;
- if (!pte_paddr)
- break;
p = rmap_ptep_map(pte_paddr);
if (ptep_test_and_clear_young(p))
referenced++;
@@ -242,7 +240,7 @@
} else {
struct pte_chain *start = page->pte.chain;
struct pte_chain *next;
- int victim_i = -1;
+ int victim_i = pte_chain_idx(start);
for (pc = start; pc; pc = next) {
int i;
@@ -253,8 +251,6 @@
for (i = pte_chain_idx(pc); i < NRPTE; i++) {
pte_addr_t pa = pc->ptes[i];
- if (victim_i == -1)
- victim_i = i;
if (pa != pte_paddr)
continue;
pc->ptes[i] = start->ptes[victim_i];
@@ -386,7 +382,7 @@
{
struct pte_chain *pc, *next_pc, *start;
int ret = SWAP_SUCCESS;
- int victim_i = -1;
+ int victim_i;
/* This page should not be on the pageout lists. */
if (PageReserved(page))
@@ -407,6 +403,7 @@
}
start = page->pte.chain;
+ victim_i = pte_chain_idx(start);
for (pc = start; pc; pc = next_pc) {
int i;
@@ -416,11 +413,6 @@
for (i = pte_chain_idx(pc); i < NRPTE; i++) {
pte_addr_t pte_paddr = pc->ptes[i];
- if (!pte_paddr)
- continue;
- if (victim_i == -1)
- victim_i = i;
-
switch (try_to_unmap_one(page, pte_paddr)) {
case SWAP_SUCCESS:
/*
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2003-11-21 17:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-11-21 17:49 [PATCH] Minor rmap optimizations Martin Schwidefsky
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox