From: Thomas Schlichter <schlicht@uni-mannheim.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test8-mm1
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 13:18:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200310201318.36486.schlicht@uni-mannheim.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031020020558.16d2a776.akpm@osdl.org>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 421 bytes --]
On Monday 20 October 2003 11:05, Andrew Morton wrote:
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.0-test8/2
>.6.0-test8-mm1
~~ snip ~~
> +fix-sqrt.patch
>
> Fix int_sqrt().
I really like this one... ;-)
The problem ist that oom_kill.c assumes that int_sqrt() never returns 0. So we
could get a division by zero there :-(
The attached patch fixes that...
Regards
Thomas
[-- Attachment #1.2: fix-oom_kill.diff --]
[-- Type: text/x-diff, Size: 538 bytes --]
--- linux-2.6.0-test8-mm1/mm/oom_kill.c.orig Mon Oct 20 12:49:58 2003
+++ linux-2.6.0-test8-mm1/mm/oom_kill.c Mon Oct 20 12:52:55 2003
@@ -63,8 +63,8 @@
cpu_time = (p->utime + p->stime) >> (SHIFT_HZ + 3);
run_time = (get_jiffies_64() - p->start_time) >> (SHIFT_HZ + 10);
- points /= int_sqrt(cpu_time);
- points /= int_sqrt(int_sqrt(run_time));
+ points /= cpu_time ? int_sqrt(cpu_time) : 1;
+ points /= run_time ? int_sqrt(int_sqrt(run_time)) : 1;
/*
* Niced processes are most likely less important, so double
[-- Attachment #2: signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-10-20 11:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-10-20 9:05 2.6.0-test8-mm1 Andrew Morton
2003-10-20 11:18 ` Thomas Schlichter [this message]
2003-10-20 15:32 ` 2.6.0-test8-mm1 John Cherry
2003-10-20 16:11 ` 2.6.0-test8-mm1 Thomas Schlichter
2003-10-20 21:48 ` 2.6.0-test8-mm1 Andrew Morton
2003-10-20 22:01 ` 2.6.0-test8-mm1 Thomas Schlichter
2003-10-20 22:17 ` 2.6.0-test8-mm1 Andrew Morton
2003-10-20 22:30 ` 2.6.0-test8-mm1 Thomas Schlichter
2003-10-21 0:43 ` 2.6.0-test8-mm1 Thomas Schlichter
2003-10-21 0:14 ` 2.6.0-test8-mm1 Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-10-21 0:27 ` 2.6.0-test8-mm1 Andrew Morton
2003-10-21 0:46 ` 2.6.0-test8-mm1 Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-10-21 1:56 ` 2.6.0-test8-mm1 Andrew Morton
2003-10-21 2:54 ` 2.6.0-test8-mm1 Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-10-21 3:49 ` 2.6.0-test8-mm1 Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2003-10-21 8:39 ` 2.6.0-test8-mm1 Thomas Schlichter
2003-10-21 17:47 ` 2.6.0-test8-mm1 James Simmons
2003-10-21 20:23 ` 2.6.0-test8-mm1 Helge Hafting
2003-10-21 20:36 ` 2.6.0-test8-mm1 Thomas Schlichter
2003-10-21 20:42 ` 2.6.0-test8-mm1 James Simmons
2003-10-21 22:53 ` 2.6.0-test8-mm1 Thomas Schlichter
2003-10-21 23:27 ` 2.6.0-test8-mm1 Robert Love
2003-10-22 2:46 ` 2.6.0-test8-mm1 Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-10-20 19:21 ` [BUG] 2.6.0-test8-mm1 Ramón Rey Vicente
2003-10-20 20:10 ` Andrew Morton
2003-10-20 21:53 ` Ramón Rey Vicente
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200310201318.36486.schlicht@uni-mannheim.de \
--to=schlicht@uni-mannheim.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox