From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 10:20:21 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test6-mm1 Message-Id: <20030929102021.76e96730.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <1064855347.23108.5.camel@ibm-c.pdx.osdl.net> References: <20030928191038.394b98b4.akpm@osdl.org> <1064855347.23108.5.camel@ibm-c.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Daniel McNeil Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: Daniel McNeil wrote: > > On Sun, 2003-09-28 at 19:10, Andrew Morton wrote: > > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.0-test6/2.6.0-test6-mm1 > > > > > > Lots of small things mainly. > > > > The O_DIRECT-vs-buffers I/O locking changes appear to be complete, so testing > > attention on O_DIRECT workloads would be useful. > > > > OSDL's STP automatically ran dbt2 tests against 2.6.0-test6-mm1 this > morning (PLM patch #2174). > > The dbt2 test uses raw devices and all the runs completed successfully. Well that's good, thanks. Actually, it is O_DIRECT against regular files which needs the extra testing. -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org