linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roger Luethi <rl@hellgate.ch>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Deprecate /proc/#/statm
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 12:40:46 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030812104046.GA6606@k3.hellgate.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030811221646.GF3170@holomorphy.com>

On Mon, 11 Aug 2003 15:16:46 -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> > has actually more values that seem correct as it is now. Since statm has
> > been broken in 2.4, fixing it for 2.6 means basically _introducing_ a file
> > full of redundant information with unclear semantics, a file which nobody
> > missed in 2.4. I still think the file should die.
> 
> Not entirely unreasonable.

Alright. We have established that /proc/#/statm has been useless at least
since 2.4. Procps doesn't even bother reading it.

I propose this very non-invasive patch for 2.6. It replaces all values
printed in statm (all of which are either redundant or bogus) with 0s (for
kblockd and others statm is a line of zeroes already). IMO the real surgery
should happen in 2.7.

Comments? Andrew?

Roger

--- fs/proc/array.c.orig	2003-08-12 11:21:54.599717655 +0200
+++ fs/proc/array.c	2003-08-12 12:09:28.912397328 +0200
@@ -392,6 +392,8 @@
 int proc_pid_statm(struct task_struct *task, char *buffer)
 {
 	int size = 0, resident = 0, shared = 0, text = 0, lib = 0, data = 0;
+	/* TODO Rip out /proc/#/statm in 2.7 */
+#if 0
 	struct mm_struct *mm = get_task_mm(task);
 	
 	if (mm) {
@@ -401,6 +403,7 @@
 
 		mmput(mm);
 	}
+#endif
 
 	return sprintf(buffer,"%d %d %d %d %d %d %d\n",
 		       size, resident, shared, text, lib, data, 0);
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2003-08-12 10:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-11  9:02 Is /proc/#/statm worth fixing? Roger Luethi
2003-08-11 16:02 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-11 21:52   ` Roger Luethi
2003-08-11 22:16     ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-12 10:40       ` Roger Luethi [this message]
2003-08-13  0:36         ` [PATCH] Deprecate /proc/#/statm William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-13  7:58           ` Roger Luethi
2003-08-14  6:40             ` William Lee Irwin III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030812104046.GA6606@k3.hellgate.ch \
    --to=rl@hellgate.ch \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox