From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Con Kolivas Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 07:55:54 +1000 References: <20030809203943.3b925a0e.akpm@osdl.org> <94490000.1060612530@[10.10.2.4]> <20030811180552.GG32488@holomorphy.com> In-Reply-To: <20030811180552.GG32488@holomorphy.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200308120755.54518.kernel@kolivas.org> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: William Lee Irwin III , "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Tue, 12 Aug 2003 04:05, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 07:35:31AM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > > Degredation on kernbench is still there: > > Kernbench: (make -j N vmlinux, where N = 16 x num_cpus) > > Elapsed System User CPU > > 2.6.0-test3 45.97 115.83 571.93 1494.50 > > 2.6.0-test3-mm1 46.43 122.78 571.87 1496.00 > > Quite a bit of extra sys time. I thought the suspected part of the sched > > changes got backed out, but maybe I'm just not following it ... > > Is this with or without the unit conversion fix for the load balancer? > > It will be load balancing extra-aggressively without the fix. Yes, test3-mm1 includes load balancing fix you suggested in an akpm modified form. Con -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org