From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:05:52 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test3-mm1 Message-ID: <20030811180552.GG32488@holomorphy.com> References: <20030809203943.3b925a0e.akpm@osdl.org> <94490000.1060612530@[10.10.2.4]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <94490000.1060612530@[10.10.2.4]> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 07:35:31AM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > Degredation on kernbench is still there: > Kernbench: (make -j N vmlinux, where N = 16 x num_cpus) > Elapsed System User CPU > 2.6.0-test3 45.97 115.83 571.93 1494.50 > 2.6.0-test3-mm1 46.43 122.78 571.87 1496.00 > Quite a bit of extra sys time. I thought the suspected part of the sched > changes got backed out, but maybe I'm just not following it ... Is this with or without the unit conversion fix for the load balancer? It will be load balancing extra-aggressively without the fix. -- wli -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org