linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Roger Luethi <rl@hellgate.ch>
To: linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Is /proc/#/statm worth fixing?
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2003 11:02:13 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030811090213.GA11939@k3.hellgate.ch> (raw)

/proc/#/statm is a joke. Out of 7 columns, 2 are always zero in 2.6. Of
the remaining columns, at least one more is incorrect. You can most
certainly get all the intended values off /proc/#/status anyway [1].

In 2.4, more columns show actual data, but also more of them are wrong.
To top it off, 2.4 and 2.6 show vastly different numbers for several
colums (where they clearly shouldn't).

/proc/#/statm is bust and any tool relying on it is broken. Can we just
remove that file? Maybe print poisoned values in 2.6 to prevent the odd
program from crashing (if there are any), and remove it in 2.7.

Roger

[1] Mind you it's tricky to find out what correct behaviour would be if the
    only documentation you can find has obviously been wrong forever.
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>

             reply	other threads:[~2003-08-11  9:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-08-11  9:02 Roger Luethi [this message]
2003-08-11 16:02 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-11 21:52   ` Roger Luethi
2003-08-11 22:16     ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-12 10:40       ` [PATCH] Deprecate /proc/#/statm Roger Luethi
2003-08-13  0:36         ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-08-13  7:58           ` Roger Luethi
2003-08-14  6:40             ` William Lee Irwin III

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030811090213.GA11939@k3.hellgate.ch \
    --to=rl@hellgate.ch \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox