From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 08:09:53 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test1-mm1 Message-ID: <20030716150953.GL15452@holomorphy.com> References: <20030715225608.0d3bff77.akpm@osdl.org> <20030716104448.GC25869@ip68-4-255-84.oc.oc.cox.net> <20030716035848.560674ac.akpm@osdl.org> <20030716122454.GJ15452@holomorphy.com> <20030716143221.GD25829@ip68-4-255-84.oc.oc.cox.net> <20030716144155.GK15452@holomorphy.com> <20030716150207.GE25829@ip68-4-255-84.oc.oc.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030716150207.GE25829@ip68-4-255-84.oc.oc.cox.net> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: "Barry K. Nathan" Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 07:41:55AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> Oh, well that won't fly; it effectively isn't a constant initializer. >> I'll see what can be rammed past gcc. We're shooting for something >> with array element 0 equal to 0x1UL and all others 0. On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 08:02:07AM -0700, Barry K. Nathan wrote: > BTW, following my e-mail signature in this message is my .config. I > guess the most notable setting is that CONFIG_SMP is disabled (i.e., > it's a UP compile). Hmm. Well, ditching the strong typechecking would "fix" it, though that's really only papering over it. Okay, enough jabbering for me... -- wli -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org