From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2003 09:38:31 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: 2.6.0-test1-mm1 Message-Id: <20030716093831.6d9aa8f1.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20030716150953.GL15452@holomorphy.com> References: <20030715225608.0d3bff77.akpm@osdl.org> <20030716104448.GC25869@ip68-4-255-84.oc.oc.cox.net> <20030716035848.560674ac.akpm@osdl.org> <20030716122454.GJ15452@holomorphy.com> <20030716143221.GD25829@ip68-4-255-84.oc.oc.cox.net> <20030716144155.GK15452@holomorphy.com> <20030716150207.GE25829@ip68-4-255-84.oc.oc.cox.net> <20030716150953.GL15452@holomorphy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: William Lee Irwin III Cc: barryn@pobox.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: William Lee Irwin III wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 07:41:55AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > >> Oh, well that won't fly; it effectively isn't a constant initializer. > >> I'll see what can be rammed past gcc. We're shooting for something > >> with array element 0 equal to 0x1UL and all others 0. > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 08:02:07AM -0700, Barry K. Nathan wrote: > > BTW, following my e-mail signature in this message is my .config. I > > guess the most notable setting is that CONFIG_SMP is disabled (i.e., > > it's a UP compile). > > Hmm. Well, ditching the strong typechecking would "fix" it, though > that's really only papering over it. > It doesn't _have_ to be initialised at compile time. Just stick a little loop in init_IRQ()? -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org