From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 02:48:41 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III Subject: Re: 2.5.74-mm3 - apm_save_cpus() Macro still bombs out Message-ID: <20030710094841.GU15452@holomorphy.com> References: <20030708223548.791247f5.akpm@osdl.org> <200307101122.59138.schlicht@uni-mannheim.de> <20030710092720.GT15452@holomorphy.com> <200307101142.37137.schlicht@uni-mannheim.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200307101142.37137.schlicht@uni-mannheim.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Thomas Schlichter Cc: Piet Delaney , Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org List-ID: On Thursday 10 July 2003 11:27, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> Could you try the following? On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 11:42:35AM +0200, Thomas Schlichter wrote: > OK, I tried it. For me it compiles! > But the size of the resulting objectfile's text section is about 64bytes > larger than with my patch. So it seems that gcc3.3 wasn't able to optimize > away all the unneeded stuff... > And I don't think my patch is that ugly, but hey, it's your decision... 64B? Why do you care? -- wli -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org