From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Phillips Subject: Re: 2.5.74-mm1 Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 01:15:46 +0200 References: <20030703023714.55d13934.akpm@osdl.org> <20030709222426.GA24923@mail.jlokier.co.uk> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200307100115.46478.phillips@arcor.de> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Davide Libenzi , Jamie Lokier Cc: Mel Gorman , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Memory Management List List-ID: On Thursday 10 July 2003 00:29, Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Jamie Lokier wrote: > > Indeed. But maybe true (bounded CPU) realtime, reliable, would more > > accurately reflect what the user actually wants for some apps? > > Hopefully I'll have a couple of hours free to code and test the > SCHED_SOFTRR idea ;) It's hard to push for a new POSIX definition though :) Oops, sorry for attributing that to Jamie instead of you :-/ Regards, Daniel -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org