From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2003 20:36:28 +0100 From: Jamie Lokier Subject: Re: 2.5.74-mm1 Message-ID: <20030707193628.GA10836@mail.jlokier.co.uk> References: <20030703023714.55d13934.akpm@osdl.org> <200307060414.34827.phillips@arcor.de> <200307071424.06393.phillips@arcor.de> <20030707152339.GA9669@mail.jlokier.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Davide Libenzi Cc: Mel Gorman , Daniel Phillips , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Memory Management List List-ID: Davide Libenzi wrote: > The *application* has to hint the scheduler, not the user. Agreed. (I think the user/PAM idea came up for the same sort of reason that only console users are able to open /dev/cdrom: asking for extra resource (in this case low latency is a resource) might be something you'd restrict to console users. But that is a very separate question from how do we get low latency to work at all!) -- Jamie -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org