From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2003 17:05:18 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III Subject: Re: What to expect with the 2.6 VM Message-ID: <20030705000518.GJ955@holomorphy.com> References: <20030703185341.GJ20413@holomorphy.com> <20030703192750.GM23578@dualathlon.random> <20030703201607.GK20413@holomorphy.com> <20030704004000.GQ23578@dualathlon.random> <20030704014624.GN20413@holomorphy.com> <20030704023414.GV23578@dualathlon.random> <20030704041048.GO20413@holomorphy.com> <20030704055426.GW23578@dualathlon.random> <20030704081522.GP20413@holomorphy.com> <20030704234432.GY23578@dualathlon.random> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030704234432.GY23578@dualathlon.random> Sender: owner-linux-mm@kvack.org Return-Path: To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Rik van Riel , "Martin J. Bligh" , Mel Gorman , Linux Memory Management List , Linux Kernel Mailing List List-ID: On Sat, Jul 05, 2003 at 01:44:32AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > I can't disagree more but I don't have any more time to argue with you. > Especially your paragraph where you mention pte-highmem wasn't worth an > answer. If you for istance could raise one single thing that make me > realize I'm missing something, you would have a chance to change my > mind. In the meantime it simply seems I fail to communicate with you and > the more posts, the less I find those posts informative and useful. The feeling on this thread is mutual. Best to cut it off. If I try to answer other points in here it'll just get worse. Sorry we couldn't come to a productive conclusion on this issue. -- wli -- To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM, see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ . Don't email: aart@kvack.org