linux-mm.kvack.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>
To: William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
	"Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>,
	Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: What to expect with the 2.6 VM
Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 01:30:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030702233014.GW23578@dualathlon.random> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030702231122.GI26348@holomorphy.com>

On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 04:11:22PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 02, 2003 at 03:15:51PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> >> What complexity? Just unmap it if you can't allocate a pte_chain and
> >> park it on the LRU.
> 
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 12:26:41AM +0200, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> > the complexity in munlock to rebuild what you destroyed in mlock, that's
> > linear at best (and for anonymous mappings there's no objrmap, plus
> > objrmap isn't even linear but quadratic in its scan [hence the problem
> > with it], though in practice it would be normally faster than the linear
> > of the page scanning ;)
> 
> Computational complexity; okay.
> 
> It's not quadratic; at each munlock(), it's not necessary to do

yes, as said above it's linear with the number of virtual pages mapped
unless you use the objrmap to rebuild rmap.

> anything more than:

is this munmap right?

> 
> for each page this mlock()'er (not _all_ mlock()'ers) maps of this thing
> 	grab some pagewise lock
> 	if pte_chain allocation succeeded
> 		add pte_chain

allocated sure, but it has no information yet, you dropped the info in
mlock

> 	else
> 		/* you'll need to put anon pages in swapcache in mlock() */
> 		unmap the page

how to unmap? there's no rmap. also there may not be swap at all to
allocate swapcache from

> 	decrement lockcount
> 	if lockcount vanished
> 	park it on the LRU
> 	drop the pagewise lock
> 
> Individual mappers whose mappings are not mlock()'d add pte_chains when
> faulting the things in just like before.

Tell me how you reach the pagetable from munlock to do the unmap. If you
can reach the pagetable, the unmap isn't necessary and you only need to
rebuild the rmap. and if you can reach the pagetable efficiently w/o
rmap, it means rmap is useless in the first place.

Andrea
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"aart@kvack.org"> aart@kvack.org </a>

  reply	other threads:[~2003-07-02 23:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 74+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-07-01  1:39 Mel Gorman
2003-06-30 17:43 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-07-01 20:10   ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-01 21:41   ` Mel Gorman
2003-07-01 21:51     ` Davide Libenzi
2003-07-01 21:58     ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-02  9:01       ` Mel Gorman
2003-07-01  2:25 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-01  3:02   ` Andrew Morton
2003-07-01  3:22     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-01  3:25       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-01  3:29       ` Rik van Riel
2003-07-01  4:04         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-01 11:01     ` Hugh Dickins
2003-07-01  3:25   ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-01  4:39     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-01  6:33       ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-01  7:49         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-01  8:59           ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-01  9:27             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-01 14:24             ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-01 16:22               ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-01 17:54                 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-02  3:04                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-01 14:42           ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-01 21:45     ` Mel Gorman
2003-07-01 22:06       ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-01 21:46   ` Mel Gorman
2003-07-02  3:08     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-02 15:57   ` Mel Gorman
2003-07-02 17:11     ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-02 17:10       ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-02 17:47         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-02 17:52           ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-02 18:13             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-02 18:05           ` Rik van Riel
2003-07-02 20:05             ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-02 21:40           ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-02 21:48             ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-07-02 22:14               ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-02 22:02             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-02 22:15               ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-02 22:26                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-02 23:11                   ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-02 23:30                     ` Andrea Arcangeli [this message]
2003-07-02 23:55                       ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-03 11:31                         ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-03 11:46                           ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-03 12:58                             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-03 13:06                               ` Rik van Riel
2003-07-03 13:48                                 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-03 18:53                                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-03 19:27                                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-03 19:32                                     ` Rik van Riel
2003-07-03 20:16                                     ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-04  0:40                                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-04  1:46                                         ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-04  2:34                                           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-04  4:10                                             ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-04  5:54                                               ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-04  8:15                                                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-04 23:44                                                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-05  0:05                                                     ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-05  0:08                                                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-03 18:48                               ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-03 18:54                                 ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-03 19:33                                   ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-03 22:21                                     ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-04  0:46                                       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-04  1:33                                         ` Jamie Lokier
2003-07-04  1:36                                         ` William Lee Irwin III
2003-07-03 19:06                           ` Andrew Morton
2003-07-03 19:34                             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2003-07-02 18:07         ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030702233014.GW23578@dualathlon.random \
    --to=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=mbligh@aracnet.com \
    --cc=mel@csn.ul.ie \
    --cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox